Thank you very much for your suggestions and insights — I’ll try different approaches.
I’m not sure which modern assemblers have something similar; perhaps ARM does.

By the way, I wrote a small article about your assembler (in Russian) to raise interest:
https://habr.com/ru/articles/986752/
You ...

instead of
avx_loop:
vmovdqu ymm0, [rcx]+
vmovdqu ymm1, [rdx]+
vpaddb ymm0, ymm0, ymm1
vmovdqu [r8]+, ymm0

you will write

Load32Bytes ymm0, rcx
Load32Bytes ymm1, rdx
vpadd ymm0, ymm0, ymm1
Store32Bytes r8, ymm0

which is almost as elegant and does not conflict with assembler syntax ...

Hi Pavel,

Thank you very much for the new €Assembler version — it works like a charm!

I have one suggestion that I would like to discuss.
A long time ago, I worked with the MACRO‑11 assembler on a DEC PDP‑11 computer.
Manual:
https://bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/rsts_e/V09/7_MACRO_Programming/AA ...

I don't think that it is a problem anyway, 0x2000 or 0x3000, who cares? Of course you might avoid the literals and use named constants as in you first example.


I have no problems with constants at all, the only slightly annoying issue, especially in this case, is that they may change if I ...

And thank you for the example, but here is a small technical trouble: the .data section is now located at 0x3000 because you added constants directly to StdOutput. As a result, they were placed in the .rodata section. This additional section shifted .data from 0x2000 to 0x3000:
;...
handler:
SUB ...

However, I still don't understand the code in your handler , the structure of CONTEXT64, why mov [R8+0x0F8], safe_place, DATA=Q ,
who miraculously set R8 with what...


Oh, it is quite simple.
In Windows x64 SEH, when an exception occurs, the system calls my exception handler with the following ...

Currently I'm finishing a new version of €ASM but SEH will not be in it yet, I'm sorry.


Thank you for the quick response!

Just to clarify — no, no, I'm not asking for SEH to be implemented in EuroAssembler at all. That would be overengineering, and SEH is handled differently on different ...

I trying to get SEH running in Assembly (Windows, x64).
Everything works as expected, but I unable to get RVA for my try... section, handler and unwind struct. For the moment, just for test, I placed hard coded constants, and it works, but how to do this in proper way?
Code:
EUROASM CPU=X64, SIMD ...

Thank you very much, this is exactly what I needed. I had already tried explicit declaration of the sections, but I used the wrong syntax and was not aware of auto segmentation. Now I understand how it should be and it works.

If I try to set an alignment greater than 16 for some reason, the following warnings are issued:

W3410 Requested alignment 4096 is greater then alignment 16 of section [.bss]. "addresses.asm"{10}
W3410 Requested alignment 64 is greater then alignment 16 of section [.text]. "addresses.asm"{18 ...